bluflamingo ([identity profile] bluflamingo.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] sg_five_things2009-01-21 01:34 pm

Prompt 63.01

Five suggested missions that Hammond nixed without a second thought


Participation is open to all. If this is your own prompt, you're free to write to it (please do!). Post your list as a comment to this post, adding additional comments if you exceed the character limit. It's OK to post as Anonymous, then come out later or not as you choose. Responses will be screened until February 2 to see what people come up with independently. You can still respond to the prompt after the February 2 unveiling.

General info and a place to ask questions: the comm 'welcome' post.

Technical-support questions: tech help.

Suggestions: the suggestion box.

To supply a new prompt: the open call for prompts.

Subject-line spoiler warnings for late-season SGA eps and the SG-1 movies, thanks!

February 2 is the official due date. If you're posting a response after the unveiling announcement on February 2, please copy the link to your comment, click on the 'set 63' tag, and reply to the post 'Set 63 Responses Unscreened' with the link to your new comment-response. That helps people find and read and comment on responses that weren't there when they cruised through right after the reveal. Pimp the link in your journal, too, if you want to let your flist know you've posted something new.
sid: (Five Things Stargate)

[personal profile] sid 2010-06-10 08:21 pm (UTC)(link)
1. *snickers at clever!Daniel*

2. You know, that (minus the fatal bit, of course) would be a great idea for a fic!

3. Oh, Jack. Hockey isn't the answer to everything. :-D

4. *shivers and makes sure there are no holes in any windowscreens*

5. Now I want to know what effect the bacteria had on the rest of SG-1! Or maybe they were just busy helping shape Teal'c's batshit insane plan. *nods*