lilyleia78: Close up of a lily in black and white (SG1: JD elevator scene)
lilyleia78 ([personal profile] lilyleia78) wrote in [community profile] sg_five_things2009-09-03 01:29 pm
Entry tags:

Prompt 79.04

Five people Jack kisses at his retirement party (after he's had a few).


Participation is open to all. If this is your own prompt, you're free to write to it (please do!). Post your list as a comment to this post, adding additional comments if you exceed the character limit. It's OK to post as Anonymous, then come out later or not as you choose. Responses will be screened until September 14 to see what people come up with independently. You can still respond to the prompt after the September 14 unveiling.

General info and a place to ask questions: the comm 'welcome' post.

Technical-support questions: tech help.

Suggestions: the suggestion box.

To supply a new prompt: the open call for prompts.

Subject-line spoiler warnings for late-season SGA eps and the SG-1 movies, thanks!


September 14 is the official due date. If you're posting a response after the unveiling announcement on September 14, please copy the link to your comment, click on the 'set 79' tag, and reply to the post 'Set 79 Responses Unscreened' with the link to your new comment-response. That helps people find and read and comment on responses that weren't there when they cruised through right after the reveal. Pimp the link in your journal, too, if you want to let your flist know you've posted something new.

Re: Part 2/2

[identity profile] theeverdream.livejournal.com 2009-09-17 12:07 am (UTC)(link)
Glad that you liked it :-)

Yes... poor 4. And Jacob, I figured with multiple universes, at least one of them could be totally off the wall :-D

Re: Part 2/2

[identity profile] theeverdream.livejournal.com 2009-09-17 12:08 am (UTC)(link)
o_O *dies*

bleach yesplz

Re: Part 2/2

[identity profile] theeverdream.livejournal.com 2009-09-17 12:09 am (UTC)(link)
Yay for #3! Hehee.

And yeah... I could totally just see Daniel messing with the fabric of space-time without meaning to or realizing it.. hehe :)

Re: Part 1/2

[identity profile] theeverdream.livejournal.com 2009-09-17 12:33 am (UTC)(link)
Being able to write #1 was a huge bonus to the multiverse idea... somewhere in some universe, Jack needs his Sara and Charlie.
sid: (Five Things Stargate)

Re: Five people Jack kisses at his retirement party (after he's had a few)

[personal profile] sid 2009-09-17 12:55 am (UTC)(link)
Damn right! Walter presumably writes his own job description, anyway!
sid: (Jack smiling)

Re: Five people Jack kisses at his retirement party (after he's had a few)

[personal profile] sid 2009-09-17 12:56 am (UTC)(link)
I can just picture it....

LOL
sid: (J/D Always)

Re: Five people Jack kisses at his retirement party (after he's had a few)

[personal profile] sid 2009-09-17 12:59 am (UTC)(link)
*giggles* Don't know where the hummus idea came from, but I love it!

Vala and Jack are both outwardly wacky with hidden depths. I think they'd be great friends. :-)

Daniel is a given, of course! Party or no, sober or loaded. *sighs happily*
sid: (Five Things Stargate)

Re: Five people Jack kisses at his retirement party (after he's had a few)

[personal profile] sid 2009-09-17 01:00 am (UTC)(link)
\o/

Re: Five people Jack kisses at his retirement party (after he's had a few)

[identity profile] msbeata.livejournal.com 2009-09-17 04:49 am (UTC)(link)
But no one expects the General osculation!

Dear ol' Walter, the things he puts up with.

I bet he hooked up with Aunt Mary.

Re: 5 kisses at Jack's retirement party

[identity profile] wishfulaces.livejournal.com 2009-09-17 12:03 pm (UTC)(link)
Hee! 3 is total Jack logic!

Thanks for reading. :)

Re: 5 kisses at Jack's retirement party

[identity profile] wishfulaces.livejournal.com 2009-09-17 12:04 pm (UTC)(link)
I wonder how much anyone was shocked at that party? :) Thanks for reading!

Re: 5 kisses at Jack's retirement party

[identity profile] wishfulaces.livejournal.com 2009-09-17 12:05 pm (UTC)(link)
It was all actually a clever ploy on Teal'c's part because he wanted to be kissed. He's a sly one, our T. ;)

Thanks for reading!
sid: (Jack smiling)

Re: Five people Jack kisses at his retirement party (after he's had a few)

[personal profile] sid 2009-09-17 12:52 pm (UTC)(link)
And I'll bet Aunt Mary was sitting in... THE COMFY CHAIR! :-D

Re: No spoilers (Not intentionally, anyway)

[identity profile] the-summoning-d.livejournal.com 2009-09-17 04:15 pm (UTC)(link)
Thanks! :D

Re: Five people Jack kisses at his retirement party (after he's had a few)

[identity profile] jd-junkie.livejournal.com 2009-09-20 02:20 pm (UTC)(link)
Heh.
That kiss later'll be a doozy. ;-)
sid: (Jack smiling)

Re: Five people Jack kisses at his retirement party (after he's had a few)

[personal profile] sid 2009-09-20 03:06 pm (UTC)(link)
I think Daniel will probably think he has a point to prove, about why his kisses are really all that Jack needs. Not that he isn't enjoying watching Jack get tipsy and have a good time. *G*

Re: Sweeter Than Wine 2/2

[identity profile] happydog57.livejournal.com 2009-09-21 03:32 am (UTC)(link)

Yay! You promoted Paul Davis! About time and good idea on why it hadn't happened before.

I like the nod to the fact that Jack's retirement doesn't solve all the DADT problems. But the way you wrote about them just quietly stealing away together and Jack looking forward to that time was so sweet.
esteefee: Shep pointing his Beretta at the camera. (big_gun)

Re: No spoilers (Not intentionally, anyway)

[personal profile] esteefee 2009-09-30 05:27 am (UTC)(link)
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!

(in case the squeal doesn't do it)--LOVES. All five were perfect, but Teal'c and Sheppard made me :) :) :)

Re: No spoilers (Not intentionally, anyway)

(Anonymous) 2009-10-14 04:56 am (UTC)(link)
*squee* I LOVE John/Jack and there is SO little out there with them together. Thanks for this. Completely awesome.

Re: No spoilers (Not intentionally, anyway)

[identity profile] the-summoning-d.livejournal.com 2009-10-25 11:15 pm (UTC)(link)
Okay, so somehow I missed this comment. A very belated THANK YOU :D Glad you liked!

Re: No spoilers (Not intentionally, anyway)

[identity profile] dimac99.livejournal.com 2010-01-18 03:42 am (UTC)(link)
Ha ha! Stargate was my original online fandom so I couldn't not look at what you wrote and you made me laugh so the mission was a success. I'm just glad it wasn't Daniel because I think the overwhelming, can't-move-for-falling-over-it-because-it's-everywhere Jack/Daniel thing in Stargate fandom was what put me off slash originally. Seriously, I found it *SO* unbelievable that I wouldn't read anything with a slash tag on it between then and a couple of years ago!

Re: No spoilers (Not intentionally, anyway)

[identity profile] the-summoning-d.livejournal.com 2010-01-18 11:08 am (UTC)(link)
Excellent! Yeah, I know what you mean about Jack/Daniel - I like it well enough in small doses, but it gets annoying when one pairing completely takes over a fandom which is why I've long since given up on Torchwood.

Page 4 of 4